Hi Stewart,
See inline for comments
On 2012-10-08 05:37, Stewart Bryant wrote:
Stewart Bryant has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-04: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and
Please take a look at my RFC draft and share your comments with me so that I
might improve it. I would like discuss this draft in IETF meetings in Atlanta.
Thanks,
Hosnieh
A new version of I-D, draft-rafiee-cga-tsig-00.txt has been successfully
submitted by Hosnieh Rafiee and posted to
Russ Housley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Hi Magnus,
On 08/10/2012 13:29, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
Hi Stewart,
See inline for comments
On 2012-10-08 05:37, Stewart Bryant wrote:
Stewart Bryant has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-04: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact
On Oct 8, 2012, at 19:22, Stewart Bryant stbry...@cisco.com wrote:
My point is that we have a practical experiment ongoing with the
huge number of PWs in deployment running over MPLS without
c/s protection at the tunnel or network layer and I have never seen
anyone raise an issue in either
