The two areas in which I think this proposal can benefit from some more
discussion:
Clearly, mitigating the external ND table DoS is one of the major pain
points addressed by this. Thinking point: Is there any way to structure the
transition from legacy ND to efficient ND in such a way
Hello Thierry,
Le 27/10/2012 11:30, Thierry Ernst a écrit :
Many thanks to John for his post. Yes, what is the problem we are
trying to solve here ? With NEMO, there is no problem related to
changing IP addresses ? NEMO is the solution for that. The
in-vehicle router would still get a new CoA
[I don't know if this made it to the list]
Original Message
Subject: Re: draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-00.txt
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:18:07 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark nordm...@sonic.net
To: Mark ZZZ Smith markzzzsm...@yahoo.com.au
CC: Carsten Bormann
On 11/1/12 11:23 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
But most of this only helps with the addresses for which hosts actually exist.
In the transition, routers still need to implement rate-limiting on their
multicast NS.
(With Efficient-ND, hosts defer to routers for finding other hosts.) Maybe we
Alexandru Petrescu alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
AP Well yes, the prefix allocated to a vehicle when using NEMO is
AP actually DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation RFC6276. In that RFC the
AP presence of HA is mandatory.
AP But some times HA may not be available, e.g. in remote areas
