The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Maintenance WG (6man) to
consider the following document:
- 'Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6 Neighbor
Discovery'
draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-03.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next
Hi, Ole,
On 01/14/2013 04:13 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
On 01/14/2013 05:10 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
We have published a revision of our I-D entitled Security Implications
of IPv6 options of Type 10xx, about IPv6 smurf amplifiers.
The I-D is available at:
Hi, Simon,
On 01/15/2013 07:12 AM, Simon Perreault wrote:
Le 2013-01-14 20:13, Fernando Gont a écrit :
No. The following text in Section 4.2 of RFC 2460 overrides what's in
RFC 4443:
An earlier RFC can't override a later RFC. The later RFC wins.
I agree that my phrasing was sloppy (at best
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Distributing Address Selection Policy using DHCPv6
Author(s) : Arifumi Matsumoto
