Re: [saag] security consideration of CGA and SSAS - I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas

> Sujing Zhou > 25 March 2013 06:54 > > Christian Huitema 写于 2013-03-25 12:33:40: > > > > What is the pointing of adding sec since the ratio of effor > > required by attacker and user is always 2^59, as Jari argued. > > > > 2^59 is a rather large number. Everything

Re: RE: RE: [saag] security consideration of CGA and SSAS - I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas

Christian Huitema 写于 2013-03-25 12:33:40: > > What is the pointing of adding sec since the ratio of effor > required by attacker and user is always 2^59, as Jari argued. > > 2^59 is a rather large number. Everything else being equal, another > 1 second of computation at the user translates i

RE: RE: [saag] security consideration of CGA and SSAS - I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas

> What is the pointing of adding sec since the ratio of effor required by   > attacker and user is always 2^59, as Jari argued. 2^59 is a rather large number. Everything else being equal, another 1 second of computation at the user translates into another 18 billion years at the attacker. -- C

Re: RE: [saag] security consideration of CGA and SSAS - I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas

Christian Huitema 写于 2013-03-22 07:56:20: > > Hosnieh, > > You should probably split your proposal in two parts: the proposal > to replace CGA by just checking an extract of the address; and > potential improvements to SEND that are independent of whether we > use CGA or your direct comparis

RE: Confirming consensus on adopting draft-carpenter-6man-ug-01

Support. > -Original Message- > From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Ole Troan > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:57 PM > To: ipv6@ietf.org List > Subject: Confirming consensus on adopting draft-carpenter-6man-ug-01 > > All, > > At the Orlando meeting