Re: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 (was Re: Re: draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-01)

> joel jaeggli > 8 June 2013 11:12 > On 6/6/13 10:41 PM, Ray Hunter wrote: >>> joel jaeggli >>> 6 June 2013 22:19 >>> On 6/6/13 4:09 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: On 06/06/2013 06:20 PM, Nalini Elkins wrote: > So, if we are talking about the M

Re: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 (was Re: Re: draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-01)

On 6/6/13 10:41 PM, Ray Hunter wrote: joel jaeggli 6 June 2013 22:19 On 6/6/13 4:09 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: On 06/06/2013 06:20 PM, Nalini Elkins wrote: So, if we are talking about the MTU of the local egress interface, then since, I believe, the minimum MTU size for

Re: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 (was Re: Re: draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-01)

On 6/6/13 1:25 PM, Ray Hunter wrote: Nalini Elkins wrote: But the reality of the situation is that much of the Internet appears to be running where "n is an arbitrary number picked out of the air by a vendor" The number is the product of compromise between (in no particular order) performance,

Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix-03

On 6/8/13 4:17 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: 2. Comcast only appears to have a /29 and a /28 (2001:558::/29, 2601::/28). That's only 1.5M /48s, and they have about 10x that many customers. They likely can't use /48 plus semantic prefixes, because if ARIN doesn't accept "semantic prefixes" as using sp