> > > Is it really true that most of the market chose to use NAT > rather than > > tunneling or dual-stack for IPv6 transition mechanism? > > there is zero truth to that. if you're going to use NAT > there is (almost) > no point in using IPv6. >
well use v6 through the NAT :-) so you keep on friendly terms with the folks who think NAT is a security "must have" and still get to give all real users an individual IP address. Christian de Larrinaga -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
