Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt

2005-07-20 Thread JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
At 08:32 20/07/2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote: In reality /64 is an architectural boundary, even if in theory it isn't. I don't believe that revisiting this is realistic. And I don't believe it is in the least necessary. Dear Brian, i am afraid this is orthogonal: - In reality /64 is an

Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Re: I-DACTION:draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt

2005-07-20 Thread JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
At 12:21 20/07/2005, Roger Jorgensen wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote: snip Up to now, what has been investigated is what IPv6 can bring to the network. I think another interesting approach is to start from a universal numbering space and investigate what IPv6 could