I was referring to dual stack.
On 9/14/10 12:08 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
>> XP has limitations but is still usable if IPv6 is enabled.
>
> on a dual-stack lan, or one with a specific dns-over-v4 crutch for xp
>
> randy
=========
J
Agreed.
On 9/14/10 10:50 AM, "Jason Weil" wrote:
> True.
>
> Usable in a dual-stack environment.
>
> Not usable IPv6-only.
>
> Jason
>
>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: John Jason Brzozowski
>> [mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.
ive Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>
>>
> --------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Admin
It was in reply to an earlier comment. This is the extent of its relevance.
> From: Fred Baker
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:12:55 -0400
> To: John Jason Brzozowski
> Cc: "Stark, Barbara" , "Azinger, Marla"
> ,
> ,
> , IETF IPv6
> Mailing
> From: Fred Baker
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:04:23 -0400
> To: Mikael Abrahamsson
> Cc: ,
> , IETF IPv6
> Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Fred Baker wrote:
>>> Um, what does a
> From: Mikael Abrahamsson
> Organization: People's Front Against WWW
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:21:50 -0400
> To: IETF IPv6 Mailing List
> Cc: ,
>
> Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Fred Baker wrote:
>
>> Um, what does a router do? Look at the exa
> From: Fred Baker
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:53:30 -0400
> To: "Stark, Barbara"
> Cc: ,
> , IETF IPv6
> Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
>
>
>
> On Jul 29, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Stark, Barbara wrote:
>> Why does it need to be a dynamic routing protocol? Why no
one of
the sub-delegated routers need to forward packets within the home it will
use its default route, punt to its northbound router which in turn should
have all the necessary routing information. Does this seem logical?
John
=
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast
Inline
> From: "Azinger, Marla"
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:39:16 -0400
> To: Fred Baker , IETF IPv6 Mailing List
> Cc: ,
>
> Subject: RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
>
> 1. Im really not sure an IETF document is really needed here. What you wrote
> is an example of justification
=
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Corporation
e) mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com
m) 609-377-6594
=
> From: Fred Baker
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:09:20 -0400
> To: IETF IPv6 Mailing List
> Cc: ,
>
> Subject: Comments on IPv6 Pr
ps://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>
=========
John Jason Brzozowski (CISSP, RHCT)
Comcast Corporation
e) mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Hemant,
There is no DHCPv6 mechabism to explicitly transmit router/gateway information.
Regards,
John
##
John Jason Brzozowski, CISSP, RHCT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
484-994-6787
##
-Original Message-
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)&quo
12 matches
Mail list logo
