So who is looking at LISP?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 7, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Suresh Krishnan suresh.krish...@ericsson.com
wrote:
Hi all,
The 4rd draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-4rd-04)
describes a solution for providing IPv4 connectivity over IPv6. The
draft describes
Agreed! I know very well of customer ISPs and large independent enterprise
network customers that one, would not accept this and two, since they have
their own address space this would FAIL!
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 19, 2012, at 8:32 PM, George Mitchell george+i...@m5p.com wrote:
On
advertisements for aggregated
prefixes between a /32 and /64 with policy based routing. This has minimized
the potential for overlap and has also allowed the routing tables to be much
smaller. Has anyone else tried this approach?
V/R
Jon Steen
On Sep 26, 2012, at 4:36 AM, Ole Trøan otr...@employees.org
protocol used. What is the reliance of this RFC?
Jon Steen
On Friday, May 25, 2012, Bob Hinden wrote:
Med,
On May 23, 2012, at 10:38 PM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com javascript:;
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com javascript:; wrote:
Dear Bob,
Yes, I read that message. It is one of reasons I
