.
Thanks.
--Rich
-Original Message-
From: Masanobu Kawashima [mailto:kawashi...@vx.jp.nec.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 5:04 PM
To: Rich Smith (rjsmith2); ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872)
Hi Richard,
Thank you for your report.
I think
:-)
--Rich
-Original Message-
From: Masanobu Kawashima [mailto:kawashi...@vx.jp.nec.com]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 11:42 AM
To: Rich Smith (rjsmith2)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872)
Hi Richard,
Thank you for your reply.
These sections
¢(._.)
NEC AccessTechnica, Ltd.
Product Development Department
Masanobu Kawashima
kawashi...@vx.jp.nec.com
http://www.necat.co.jp
Lifetime
and thus I'd repeat your test with changing of Valid Lifetime
and see what you see for behavior by the host.
Hemant
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Masanobu Kawashima
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 8:59 AM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
.
Sincerely,
Masanobu
¢(._.)
NEC AccessTechnica, Ltd.
Access Networks Engineering Department
Masanobu Kawashima
for
behavior by the host.
Hemant
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Masanobu Kawashima
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 8:59 AM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Question about IPv6 Address State
Hi All,
I'd like to ask simple question. :-)
Can
to Preferred State from Deprecated state?
I think it's possible to do. However, there is no clear description
in RFC4861/4862. Is it written in other RFCs?
We have to define clearly in RFC?
Sincerely,
Masanobu
Hi Kawashima-san,
On 11-03-07 08:59 AM, Masanobu Kawashima wrote:
Hi All,
I'd
We examined many implementations before proposal.
Many implementations (such as Windows, Linux, FreeBSD,
and many other network devices) display lower case.
I would like to ask simple question.
Can we change many implementations?
I think that is too late.
lowercase is already de fact standard.
will converted
to hex in inet_ntop().
Even if we change current code, to deploy new code is not easy.
Regards,
Masanobu Kawashima
I read and I agree with the document except for Appendix A.
For one, I disagree that v4 mapped addresses are not recommended.
They're commonly used for sockets that support both
