On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 09:47 +0200, Dan Luedtke wrote:
Since then, router solicitations would be issued regularly until
client recieves RA with RDNSS, connection is cancelled by user or:
We have a setup here were we have 50+ clients on some access points
with about 100 access points
it be enough to discuss and agree an errata for the RFC? Doing
full RFC6106bis might be overkill.
Chairs?
Best regards,
Teemu
2012/4/27 Pavel Simerda pav...@pavlix.net
Hello,
my proposition is the same as Teemu's or very similar.
1) I propose
is quite new.
There is an open question, when to consider RDNSS information lost. It
could be:
1) Last RDNSS from RAs expired.
2) Last IPv6 RDNSS expired (RDNSS or DHCPv6)
3) Last RDNSS lost (IPv6 or IPv4)
Pavel Simerda
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 14:00 +0200, Ole Trøan wrote:
Pavel,
I concur with your
is quite new.
There is an open question, when to consider RDNSS information lost. It
could be:
1) Last RDNSS from RAs expired.
2) Last IPv6 RDNSS expired (RDNSS or DHCPv6)
3) Last RDNSS lost (IPv6 or IPv4)
Pavel Simerda
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 14:00 +0200, Ole Trøan wrote:
Pavel,
I concur with your
