against
listing the privacy benefits this has over the traditional way of EUI64-based
SLAAC address assignment, I presume?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
it is
solved by treating IPv6 addresses as opaque and not giving any
special meaning to the IPv4-mapped prefix.
As above that does not help. If your SPF process is operating in the
setup above, IPv4-mapped IPv6 space needs to be treated with the IPv4
ruleset.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
regards
Philipp Kern
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
address), which
is pretty much fixed by implementations to operate at the 64 bit
boundary. Granted, that's mostly when dealing with Ethernet-based
infrastructures and the document does explain that the length of the
interface identifier depends on the link type (5.5.3 d).
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
guaranteed to be NAT'ed. These seem to
be two entirely different categories with the first one being more
likely in a service provider / hosting scenario.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
IETF IPv6
on the
Standards Track, so it seems fair that it should be incorporated into a
RFC6724bis, I think.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative
identifier extensively and not the MAC
address anymore. So you cannot do any static assignment based on MAC
addresses.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6
advantages/disadvantages for shipping this
information by RDNSS vs. DHCPv6.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https
.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[1] http://www.cymru.com/gillsr/documents/icmp-redirects-are-bad.pdf
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6