FW: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses"

-Original Message- From: jspark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 7:51 PM To: 'Pekka Savola' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Hi Pekka. On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Pekka Savola wrote: > First, there is typically just one

RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses"

Hi, Pekka. >>>Pekka Savola wrote: >> > First, there is no guarantee of uniqueness in the first place, as >> > DAD on the IPv6 link-local unicast address was performed on the >> > address, not the Interface-ID. In practice, the collisions should be very rare, though. >>Myung-Ki Shin wrote: >>

RE: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses"

Hi Erik Thanks for your comments. > I'm trying to understand why the RFC 3306 are so broken for scope <=2 > that they can not be used. > While using the new address format for scope <= 2 would presumably be >preferred I don't see why prohibiting > (as the "MUST" above does) the use of RFC 3306