Hi,
We have in Alcatel a partial implementation of SEND in our labs.
By partial, I mean with CGA and RSA options only, and supposed compliant
to RFC 3972 and partially 3971.
Kind regards,
Laurent Clévy
Francis Dupont wrote:
I have two questions about SEND:
- is an "open source" or not implementation available?
- in the RFC 3971 section 6.4.3 Trust Anchor Option page 35,
an anchor name of type FQDN is "stored as a string, in the
DNS wire format, as specified in RFC 1034" but obviously
^^^^
this name is a dNSName for SubjectAltName, i.e., the
example trustanchor.example.com is encoded into
't' 'r' 'u' ... 'e' '.' 'c' 'o' 'm'
and not
11 't' 'r' 'u' ... 'e' 3 'c' 'o' 'm' 0
which is the real format used on the wire but is useful only
when names are directly given to DNS internal routines.
BTW this wire format should be referenced by section 3.1 of
RFC 1035 (not 1034), so I think the word "wire" is a typo,
isn't it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Alcatel CIT
Route de Nozay
91460 Marcoussis
Voice +33 (0)1 6963 1834
Fax +33 (0)1 6963 1767
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
