Re: (continued) IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-01.txt

2004-07-28 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:11:02 +1000, > "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> 3. I don't think the advantage for the optimistic node when two nodes >> simultaneously perform DAD is justified (Section 4.3). >> >> This gives the Optimistic Node a slight advantage >> over Stan

Re: (continued) IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-01.txt

2004-07-26 Thread Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
G'day Jinmei, the other email covers your other points, these are the two I left out last time. > 3. I don't think the advantage for the optimistic node when two nodes > simultaneously perform DAD is justified (Section 4.3). > > This gives the Optimistic Node a slight advantage >