On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:37:38 -0700,
James Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why not send this email message to the IAB and ask?
OK, will do (with ccing to this list).
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:37:38 -0700,
James Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why not send this email message to the IAB and ask?
OK, will do (with ccing to this list).
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Dear IAB members,
I'm currently working on revising RFC2462 (IPv6 Stateless Address
Autoconfiguration), and am wondering how to deal with the IAB
recommendation described in Section 2.3 of the following message:
http://www.iab.org/appeals/kre-ipng-address-arch-draft-standard-response.html
The
Hello,
I'd like to know opinions on the following IAB recommendation
regarding rfc2462bis (the latter part):
e) We recommend that, via a recommendation to the IESG, that the IPv6
Working Group expeditiously revise RFC-2461 to:
* specifically note that it is not valid to configure an
Why not send this email message to the IAB and ask?
jak
- Original Message -
From: JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H (B [EMAIL PROTECTED])
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 5:15 AM
Subject: [2462bis] IAB recommendation on prefix lengths
Hello,
I'd
