Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-01.txt]

2011-05-02 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-04-06 05:45, Thomas Narten wrote: Looking at the revised document, here are some additional comments. One lightweight approach to ECMP or LAG is this: if there are N equally good paths to choose from, then form a modulo(N) hash [RFC2991] from a consistent set of fields in

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-01.txt]

2011-04-05 Thread Thomas Narten
Looking at the revised document, here are some additional comments. One lightweight approach to ECMP or LAG is this: if there are N equally good paths to choose from, then form a modulo(N) hash [RFC2991] from a consistent set of fields in each packet header that are certain to have

[Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-01.txt]

2011-02-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi, This version is intended to respond to the comments made during WG Last Call. Brian + Shane Original Message Subject: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-01.txt Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:30:01 -0800 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Reply-To: internet-dra...@ietf.org To:

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-01.txt]

2011-02-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
take the same path. brian Thanks, Lucy -Original Message- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 2:43 PM To: 6man Subject: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-01.txt] Hi