Re: [MBONED] IPv6 Node Requirements (bis) vs LW-MLDv2

2008-11-21 Thread Hitoshi Asaeda
Hi, > Is LW-MLDv2 a profile of MLDv2 or a subset? Does it update or modify > the MLDv2 specs? I'm somewhat confused about the relationship between > them. LW-MLDv2 is a simplified version of MLDv2. In LW-MLDv2, "EXCLUDE (S,G) join/leave" operations are eliminated from an MLDv2 host. This modific

RE: [MBONED] IPv6 Node Requirements (bis) vs LW-MLDv2

2008-11-21 Thread john.loughney
Sent: 20 November, 2008 17:31 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [MBONED] IPv6 Node Requirements (bis) vs LW-MLDv2 > >Hi, > >> IMHO, we WG might want to update this text after LW-IGMPv3/MLDv2 has >> been publushed. Otherwise, all nodes that has applicati

Re: [MBONED] IPv6 Node Requirements (bis) vs LW-MLDv2

2008-11-20 Thread Hitoshi Asaeda
Hi, > IMHO, we WG might want to update this text after LW-IGMPv3/MLDv2 has been > publushed. Otherwise, all nodes that has applications need SSM MUST implement > "full" MLDv2 (RFC3569, RFC4607) anyway, instead of LW-MLDv2; MLDv2 is not only > for the wire format but also for state processing. Ar