[Technical Errata Reported] RFC6874 (3632)

2013-05-23 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6874, Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals and Uniform Resource Identifiers. -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6874eid=3632

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6874 (3632)

2013-05-23 Thread Brian Haberman
Michael, Let me repeat myself... This is not how the errata report system is to be used. It is *not* a notification system for future proposals. That type of notification can be accomplished by posting to the appropriate IETF mailing list (ipv6@ietf.org in this case). Regards, Brian

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6874 (3632)

2013-05-23 Thread Ted Lemon
On May 23, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Michael Sweet msw...@apple.com wrote: I've seen plenty of pending (not approved, not rejected) errata for other RFCs for stuff like this. Posting to the ipv6 mailing list is useful for people involved in RFC development but is completely opaque to ordinary

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6874 (3632)

2013-05-23 Thread Stuart Cheshire
On behalf of Apple I apologise. I will talk with Michael Sweet directly and try to resolve his concerns without any more errata reports. Stuart Cheshire On 23 May, 2013, at 07:45, Brian Haberman br...@innovationslab.net wrote: Michael, Let me repeat myself... This is not how the errata

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6874 (3632)

2013-05-23 Thread Michael Sweet
Brian, I've seen plenty of pending (not approved, not rejected) errata for other RFCs for stuff like this. Posting to the ipv6 mailing list is useful for people involved in RFC development but is completely opaque to ordinary implementers of RFCs (which I have to deal with on a daily