This reminds me, I don't think the IPv6 nodes requirements draft has yet gone final, since draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08 still exists on the IETF I-D area.
Should we not update this before it goes final with the wording that has been agreed for the M and O flags, and also to clarify the assertion below, that RAs are the way to get default router and onlink prefix information? It would be a shame to not convey this consensus in the nodes document. In the draft, that's at least section 4.5.2 and 4.5.5 that probably need a tweak. Tim On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:07:47PM -0400, Bound, Jim wrote: > Christian, > > I have been down this patha and I cannot see a good case for this to be > in DHCPv6. I concur with Eric and Bernie. The entire conversion of > routes on a link should come from ND RA. Once the edge link routers > have the prefixes it is automatic for the hosts. I can see any good > reason to add state to the IPv6 network architecture for route > propogation? > > thanks > /jim > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Cristian Cadar > > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 4:50 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [dhcwg] Deafult Router information for DHCPv6 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I know that this issue was already discussed on the list but > > I ran into a problem which I would like to clarify here. > > Seemingly the only way for getting the default router > > information is to make use of the RA. So when I'm using > > dhcpv6 and want get the default router information is it a > > MUST to use the RA for this pourpose? I could not find any > > statement in any of the RFC/drafts saying that. > > I mean for the time being I cannot see any other possibility. > > There might be scenarios where the use of RA is not desired > > and prefering to have a dhcpv6 option carrying this > > information along. If the use of RA is not a MUST I think we > > need a new option. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Cristian > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dhcwg mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------