Re: [ipv6mib] Re: Auth48 update to TCP-MIB(draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2012-update-06.txt)

2004-08-24 Thread Brian Haberman
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] bs.de] On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:37 AM To: Kristine Adamson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ipv6mib] Re: Auth48 update to TCP-MIB(draft-ietf-ipv6- rfc2012-update-06.txt) On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:04:57AM -0600

RE: [ipv6mib] Re: Auth48 update to TCP-MIB(draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2012-update-06.txt)

2004-08-23 Thread Dave Thaler
t; Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ipv6mib] Re: Auth48 update to TCP-MIB(draft-ietf-ipv6- > rfc2012-update-06.txt) > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:04:57AM -0600, Kristine Adamson wrote: > > > In this case, would it be better to update draft-3291bis

Re: [ipv6mib] Re: Auth48 update to TCP-MIB (draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2012-update-06.txt)

2004-08-23 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:04:57AM -0600, Kristine Adamson wrote: > In this case, would it be better to update draft-3291bis to permit > zero-length octet-strings for InetAddress objects whose InetAddressType is > IPv4 or IPv6? We have already encountered problems with network > management app