> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:34:23 +0200,
> Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> To address rfc2462bis issue 271, "An implementation may want to use
>> stable storage for autoconfigured addresses", I've added the following
>> new (sub)section:
>>
>> ===
JINMEI Tatuya wrote:
To address rfc2462bis issue 271, "An implementation may want to use
stable storage for autoconfigured addresses", I've added the following
new (sub)section:
5.7 Retaining Configured Addresses for Stability
It i
To address rfc2462bis issue 271, "An implementation may want to use
stable storage for autoconfigured addresses", I've added the following
new (sub)section:
5.7 Retaining Configured Addresses for Stability
It is reasoanble that i