Re: [rfc2462bis issue 271] retaining addresses in stable storage

2004-02-08 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:34:23 +0200, > Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> To address rfc2462bis issue 271, "An implementation may want to use >> stable storage for autoconfigured addresses", I've added the following >> new (sub)section: >> >> ===

Re: [rfc2462bis issue 271] retaining addresses in stable storage

2004-02-06 Thread Jari Arkko
JINMEI Tatuya wrote: To address rfc2462bis issue 271, "An implementation may want to use stable storage for autoconfigured addresses", I've added the following new (sub)section: 5.7 Retaining Configured Addresses for Stability It i

[rfc2462bis issue 271] retaining addresses in stable storage

2004-02-05 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
To address rfc2462bis issue 271, "An implementation may want to use stable storage for autoconfigured addresses", I've added the following new (sub)section: 5.7 Retaining Configured Addresses for Stability It is reasoanble that i