On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Mark Smith <i...@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org> wrote: <snip> > While I do think the NAT444 option has value, I also do think it is > also fundamentally delaying the inevitable "Stick" option. In my > experience, the sooner you suffer the pain, the less you suffer over > all. ISPs with customer owned CPE are probably going to wear pain > regardless, it's all about the degree ...
It is really that simple... and it is far easier to just face it now and get over with it than to put it off into some undefined future when you anyway will have other problems to deal with. No matter what option is chosen now, if _will_ hurt. You're only option it really when you want the pain. We lost the no-pain options quite some years ago :( -- Roger Jorgensen | rog...@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | ro...@jorgensen.no -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
