Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt

2010-10-20 Thread Sam Silvester
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote: In preceding recommendations, the format of the document is to state a recommendation and follow it with an explanatory note. Which brings me to this suggestion: /*  * suggestion  */ REC-13: Residential Internet Gateways

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt

2010-10-19 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:40:07AM -0700, Fred Baker wrote: /* * suggestion */ REC-13: Residential Internet Gateways SHOULD provide a convenient means to securely update their firmware, for the installation of security patches and other manufacturer-recommended changes. Vendors

RE: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt

2010-10-19 Thread Ronald Bonica
Me too -Original Message- From: v6ops-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:17 PM To: Fred Baker Cc: Operations; IESG IESG; i...@core3.amsl.com Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple

RE: [v6ops]Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt

2010-10-19 Thread STARK, BARBARA H (ATTLABS)
...@core3.amsl.com Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple- security-15.txt On Oct 15, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: I'd think that recommending having an option that disables unattended automatic update would address this concern. Managed service

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Smith
Hi Fred, I'm ok with it. Regards, Mark. On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:40:07 -0700 Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote: On Oct 15, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: I'd think that recommending having an option that disables unattended automatic update would address this concern.

RE: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt

2010-10-19 Thread Steve.Dotson
Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt On Oct 15, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: I'd think that recommending having an option that disables unattended automatic update would address this concern. Managed service providers, since they'd be controlling the CPE, could go

RE: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt

2010-10-19 Thread Frank Bulk
- From: v6ops-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:40 PM To: Operations; IESG IESG Cc: i...@core3.amsl.com Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt On Oct 15, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Brian E

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt

2010-10-15 Thread David Conrad
Mark, On Oct 15, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Mark Smith wrote: So it won't be possible for the ISP to provide a managed CPE service, because they don't control and can't be in control of when the firmware is released to the CPE customers. I'd think that recommending having an option that disables