At Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:00:47 -0700,
Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com wrote:
This message starts a 2-week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing:
Title : A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation
Author(s) : S. Kawamura, M. Kawashima
as a Proposed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jinmei-san
Thanks for your comments.
I think they all give help in clarifying.
I will make the change.
JINMEI Tatuya wrote:
At Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:00:47 -0700,
Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com wrote:
This message starts a 2-week 6MAN Working
Support.
-shane
On Oct 26, 2009, at 15:52 MDT, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I fully support this draft.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2009-10-23 07:00, Bob Hinden wrote:
All,
This message starts a 2-week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on
advancing:
Title : A Recommendation for
I fully support this draft.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2009-10-23 07:00, Bob Hinden wrote:
All,
This message starts a 2-week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing:
Title : A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation
Author(s) : S. Kawamura, M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alex
Thanks for your support and comments.
Please see inline.
Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
I support it.
Half-substantive and half-editorial comments follow.
draft:
When the length of the
consecutive 16 bit 0 fields are equal (i.e.
I support it.
Half-substantive and half-editorial comments follow.
draft:
When the length of the
consecutive 16 bit 0 fields are equal (i.e. 2001:db8:0:0:1:0:0:1),
the former is shortened.
The former when reading it left-to-right western latin style? Maybe
better The most significant
All,
This message starts a 2-week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing:
Title : A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation
Author(s) : S. Kawamura, M. Kawashima
Filename: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-01.txt
