Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- No objection to the publication of this document, but I really would like to have the following requirement clarified. 2. Implementations MUST provide a way to signal the set of ports that will be enabled to receive UDP datagrams with a zero checksum. What is an implementation? The application running over the tunnel? You refer to "An encapsulating protocol" in the sentence before the bullet points, is this what you mean? If yes, signal from where to whom? Or maybe by "implementation" you mean "IPv6 protocol stack implementation" -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------