Re: Bug in RFC3542 (Advanced API)

2005-09-11 Thread Alice Hagens
TED]> >To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED](B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >Subject: Re: Bug in RFC3542 (Advanced API) >User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) >MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by

Re: Bug in RFC3542 (Advanced API)

2005-09-10 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 09:43:35 -0700 (PDT), > Alice Hagens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Thank you for bringing this error to our attention. Please confirm that > it is posted accurately on http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html. I've confirmed that. Thanks for updating the errata page.

Re: Bug in RFC3542 (Advanced API)

2005-06-27 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:17:47 +0900 (JST), > YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > In Page 47, Section 11.3 (Path MTU Discovery and UDP), > RFC 3542 (Advanced Sockets API for IPv6) says: > | This cmsghdr will be passed to every socket that sets the > | IPV6_RECVPATHMTU socke

Bug in RFC3542 (Advanced API)

2005-06-26 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Hello. Erik, Tatuya, and folks: In Page 47, Section 11.3 (Path MTU Discovery and UDP), RFC 3542 (Advanced Sockets API for IPv6) says: | This cmsghdr will be passed to every socket that sets the | IPV6_RECVPATHMTU socket option, even if the socket is non-connected. | Note that this also mea