Hi, Ole,
I've rev'ed the I-D according to your feedback and our recent email
exchange. Some additional notes below:
On 12/21/2012 08:20 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
[discussion of what this algorithm is similar to]
FWIW, I've added an ack to the Acks section, noting that this algorithm
was inspired by S
On 12/21/2012 11:23 AM, Rafiee, Hosnieh wrote:
> Fernando, As we have seemed to reach a stalemate in this discussion,
> I see no need for continuing it. I tried to explain everything in my
> last emails and I see no point in reiterating it here.
90% of your feedback was about how other RFCs could
On 12/21/2012 08:20 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>> We do see the usefulness of a interface-id generation algorithm, that
>>> results
>>> in stable identifiers per IPv6 prefix, while not being derived from
>>> link-layer
>>> MAC addresses.
>>>
>>> The mechanism proposed could be viewed as an modification
review: draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01
Hosnieh,
On 12/20/2012 06:06 PM, Rafiee, Hosnieh wrote:
> Now the question is whether or not you are using the "lifetime" for
> this IID or IP. If you are, then it is the same procedure as that for
> the RFC privacy exten
Fernando,
>> General comments:
>> --
>> We do see the usefulness of a interface-id generation algorithm, that
>> results
>> in stable identifiers per IPv6 prefix, while not being derived from
>> link-layer
>> MAC addresses.
>>
>> The mechanism proposed could be viewed as a
Hosnieh,
On 12/20/2012 06:06 PM, Rafiee, Hosnieh wrote:
> Now the question is whether or not you are using the "lifetime" for this
> IID or IP. If you are, then it is the same procedure as that for the RFC
> privacy extension.
The lifetime advertised in RA messages? - Of course.
>>Nobody has e
Bob, and Ole,
Thanks so much for your detailed review! Please find my comments in-line
On 12/20/2012 11:40 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
> General comments:
> --
> We do see the usefulness of a interface-id generation algorithm, that
> results
> in stable identifiers per IPv6 p
Correction to prior comment
Ole and Bob: I do think that the extension to the Privacy Extension RFC is
applicable here.
...
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/
r 20, 2012 3:41 PM
To: 6man 6man-wg
Subject: Chairs review: draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01
all,
the ADs have asked us to ensure that there are good review of documents in the
working group, prior to them being advanced to the IESG.
as a part of document last calls in the 6man working grou
all,
the ADs have asked us to ensure that there are good review of documents in the
working group, prior to them being advanced to the IESG.
as a part of document last calls in the 6man working group, Bob and I want to
try
using volunteers and/or w.g. chair reviewers, that take specific responsib
10 matches
Mail list logo
