Bob,
Bob Hinden wrote:
I also have a basic question on the partitioning of the ICMP code
space into
error and informational messages, as described in Section 2.1 of your
draft.
The partitioning of the ICMP type values has been around in all of the
ICMPv6 RFCs. This draft is updating RFC2463 cur
Bob,
Bob Hinden wrote:
...
I am not sure it is necessary to deal with an extension mechanisms at
this point in time. ...
Ok, I believe this pretty much sums it up. My reading of the feedback is that
(1) it probably does not make much sense to pursue a general extension
mechanism at this time, and
James,
I also have a basic question on the partitioning of the ICMP code space into
error and informational messages, as described in Section 2.1 of your draft.
The partitioning of the ICMP type values has been around in all of the
ICMPv6 RFCs. This draft is updating RFC2463 currently at Draft St
Gabriel,
At 02:32 AM 6/2/2004, gabriel montenegro wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please look at section 2.1 (Message General Format). The section
adds type 100, 101, 200 and 201 for private experimentation. Also
section 6 (IANA consideration) describes a policy on allocating
reclaimable ICMP ty
CTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 12:59 AM
Subject: RE: Common ICMP Type Assignment for Experimental Protocols
Gabriel,
I have submitted the updated version of the ICMPv6 draft
(draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-04
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please look at section 2.1 (Message General Format). The section
adds type 100, 101, 200 and 201 for private experimentation. Also
section 6 (IANA consideration) describes a policy on allocating
reclaimable ICMP type and code values.
Hi,
Not sure we can use 100,101,200 o
Christian Huitema wrote:
It makes sense, but there is one pitfall. More and more, firewalls come
with restrictive rules about what ICMP packets will be allowed. These
rules typically operate on ICMP type and ICMP code. Having a single
type-code combination for all experimental packets will force an
Does this seem useful? Does the format make sense? Any other potential uses
of such a facility if it were adopted?
Thanks for any comments,
-gabriel
--------
Common ICMP Type Assignment for Experimental Protocols
1. Background
Several experimental
> Does this seem useful? Does the format make sense? Any other potential
> uses of such a facility if it were adopted?
It makes sense, but there is one pitfall. More and more, firewalls come
with restrictive rules about what ICMP packets will be allowed. These
rules typically operate on ICMP type
ormat make sense? Any other potential uses
of such a facility if it were adopted?
Thanks for any comments,
-gabriel
--------
Common ICMP Type Assignment for Experimental Protocols
1. Background
Several experimental protocols will soon be requesting
10 matches
Mail list logo
