Re: FW: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses"

2003-10-24 Thread Pekka Savola
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, jspark wrote: > > But it is mandated by the specs. So > > these addresses are > > *not* truly, completely, totally, unique. > > In our spec. > The uniqueness of LL unicast address is verified by DAD procedure. > And then, EUI-64 IID (or other) is extracted from LL Unicast add

Re: FW: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses"

2003-10-24 Thread Jerome Durand
Hi I don't get: 1°) The need for such link-local adresses. Maybe it should be described in the document (saying you will not need any allocation server or equivalent is not enough I think). What type of applications you think will need these link-local adresses? 2°) Why to use the flag bi

FW: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses"

2003-10-24 Thread jspark
-Original Message- From: jspark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 7:51 PM To: 'Pekka Savola' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Hi Pekka. On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Pekka Savola wrote: > First, there is typically just one link-local address. > Either it