Hi Fernando,
> -Original Message-
> From: Fernando Gont [mailto:fg...@si6networks.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:20 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Feedback on draft-generic-6man-tunfrag-07
>
> On 02/08/2013 03:16 P
On 02/08/2013 03:16 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>>>Unfortunately, link adaptation can present a significant burden to
>>>the link endpoints, i.e., especially when the link supports high data
>>>rates and/or is located nearer the "middle" of the network instead of
>>>nearer the "edge"
Hi Fernando,
> -Original Message-
> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Fernando Gont
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 2:16 AM
> To: fltemp...@acm.org
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Feedback on draft-generic-6man-tunfrag-07
>
Hi, Fred,
Sorry for the delay in providing comments (as promised). Here they are:
Section 2:
>The current "Internet cell size" is effectively 1500 bytes, i.e., the
>minimum MTU configured by the vast majority of links in the Internet.
>IPv6 constrains this even further by specifying