Sorry for the late response I was out of the office.
= This can be added to the text at the beginning of 7.2.,
which discusses this issues.
Hmm, so the behavior corresponding to the following entry
(shown again
just to be accurate) is not currently described in the draft:
= Not
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:18:28 -0500,
Soliman, Hesham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
= Good points. I agree with that. So to keep it
consistent, I'll remove this distinction
between host and router.
Okay, but please clarify my first question, too:
First of all, which part of the main text
the change to APPENDIX C should cover the case of
an unsolicited ND message does not contain source/target LLAO,
AND the receiving node does not have a neighbor cache entry for
the source/target
(there are two conditions for a single 'case')
Is this now clear and
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:42:02 -0500,
Soliman, Hesham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
= Agreed. In addition to Appendix C, we also agreed on the list to add a
paragraph to
section 7.2 (text from Greg Daley) to clarify the general
handling. This was also added.
OK so far.
So, the change to
(Sorry for the delayed response...I hope you still remember the
context)
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:06:20 -0500,
Soliman, Hesham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Sending in hibernate mode.
I'm not sure if this one is correctly addressed:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg05107.html
(Sorry for the delayed response...I hope you still remember the
context)
= No probs, I remember it clearly.
I've compared the difference of the state machine in Appendix C
between the 03 and 05 versions (attached below). At
least it doesn't
seem to cover the case where the
Sending in hibernate mode.
I'm not sure if this one is correctly addressed:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg05107.html
(BTW: msg05107 is a comment on version 03, and I could not get a 04
version. Has that version been issued, or is the version number
bumped?)
Begin forwarded message:
From: Brian Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 1, 2005 13:04:17 EST
To: The IESG [EMAIL PROTECTED], Margaret Wasserman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mark Townsley [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bob Hinden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Request To Advance:
