There are notes that can be put on RFCs. However, I should think that
since site-local was deprecated later, this could be left to the next
revision without ambiguity.
On Nov 1, 2005, at 9:24 PM, Eric Klein wrote:
Is there a procedure where we (as a working group) can go back and
modify
these already approved RFCs and replace them with an indication
that it is
updated (say a letter to indicate that it the most recent one)
rather than
having corrections listed in several newer RFCs or assigning it a
new number
or going through a lengthy last call procedure where other issues
might
arise?
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already
tomorrow in Australia." (Charles Schulz )
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
