Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle
Hi Pekka
> > There is of course one corner case here: if a node running host
> configuration behaviour would omit separate information configuration
> behavior, in case there was no "full DHCPv6" server in the network,
> the host would not get even the I
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] ¿ÀÌÀãºÈ wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 23:19:46 +0200 (EET),
Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Information Configuration Behaviour:
configuring other information excluding addresses through
Information-request and Reply exchanges
For full clarity
Just to clarify some things quickly:
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 23:19:46 +0200 (EET),
> Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Information Configuration Behaviour:
>> configuring other information excluding addresses through
>> Information-request and Reply exchanges
> For full clarity, I'
Ralph, there's something that probably bears discussion in dhcwg
here..
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] ¿ÀÌÀãºÈ wrote:
Information Configuration Behaviour:
configuring other information excluding addresses through
Information-request and Reply exchanges
For full clarit
All,
The feedback received (both on the list and off) indicates
a consensus to adopt this work by the WG. The next version
should be published as an IPv6 WG document.
The working group now needs to ensure this document
documents sufficiently the use of the M&O bits.
Regards,
Bob & Brian
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:23:52 +0300 (EEST),
> Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Title: Consideration M and O Flags of IPv6 Router
>> Advertisement
>> Author(s): S. Park, et al.
>> Filename : draft-daniel-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt
>> Pages: 1
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Soohong Daniel Park wrote:
If M-Policy is 1, the host SHOULD invoke Host Configuration Behaviour
for address and other configuration information, regardless of the
change of the state variables. The host SHOULD NOT invoke
Information Configuration Behaviour rega
Hi
>If M-Policy is 1, the host SHOULD invoke Host Configuration Behaviour
> for address and other configuration information, regardless of the
> change of the state variables. The host SHOULD NOT invoke
> Information Configuration Behaviour regardless of O-Policy. Note,
> how
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Brian Haberman wrote:
This is a consensus call on whether the IPv6 WG should adopt:
Title : Consideration M and O Flags of IPv6 Router
Advertisement
Author(s) : S. Park, et al.
Filename : draft-daniel-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt
Pages : 12
Date : 2004-10-25
as a W
All,
This is a consensus call on whether the IPv6 WG should adopt:
Title : Consideration M and O Flags of IPv6 Router Advertisement
Author(s) : S. Park, et al.
Filename: draft-daniel-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt
Pages : 12
Da
10 matches
Mail list logo
