RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt

2005-05-31 Thread Dave Thaler
Tim Chown writes: > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:44:37AM -0400, Bound, Jim wrote: > > > > My response below. Thus I cannot support this going to the IESG without > > further discussion as my input. I also support Margaret's request for > > this to be checked by RTSP persons, and I realize Dave T. cl

Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt

2005-05-26 Thread Tim Chown
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:44:37AM -0400, Bound, Jim wrote: > > My response below. Thus I cannot support this going to the IESG without > further discussion as my input. I also support Margaret's request for > this to be checked by RTSP persons, and I realize Dave T. clearly has > this expertise

Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt

2005-05-25 Thread Erik Nordmark
Margaret Wasserman wrote: Could the current chairs perhaps comment on how they believe that the ND Proxy document, as it currently exists, fits within the IPv6 WG charter? Is there anyone else who has an opinion on this? > This is not merely a legalistic concern. I am concerned that the peop

FW: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt

2005-05-24 Thread Bound, Jim
Resending. I did not see it come back to me. Sorry for duplicates if that is the case. /jim -Original Message- From: Bound, Jim Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 10:45 AM To: 'Brian Haberman'; IPv6 WG Cc: Bob Hinden Subject: RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt

RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt

2005-05-24 Thread Bound, Jim
nks /jim > -Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Brian Haberman > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 7:40 AM > To: IPv6 WG > Cc: Bob Hinden > Subject: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt > > IPv6 WG, >

Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt

2005-05-24 Thread Margaret Wasserman
I have a process-related concern with draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt that I would like to discuss on this list to see what others think... I haven't reached the point (yet) where I have a fully-formed objection, but I have a strong enough concern that I thought it would be worth some discuss

RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt

2005-05-24 Thread juha . wiljakka
14:40 To: IPv6 WG Cc: Hinden Bob (Nokia-ES/MtView) Subject: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt IPv6 WG, This begins a 1-week Working Group Last Call on advancing: Title : Bridge-like Neighbor Discovery Proxies (ND Proxy) Author(s) : D. Thaler,

IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt

2005-05-24 Thread Brian Haberman
IPv6 WG, This begins a 1-week Working Group Last Call on advancing: Title : Bridge-like Neighbor Discovery Proxies (ND Proxy) Author(s) : D. Thaler, et al. Filename: draft-ietf-ipv6-ndproxy-02.txt Pages : 20 Date: