> I can't see any explicit reason based on RFC 2461 to not
> count the NS as a 'valid solicitation', althought it
> explicitly violates section 4.3 in ND.
> If a node doesn't include the option, it may be dropped by
> (over?) zealous implementations.
FWIW I didn't see any such text either.
> I
Hi Erik,
Thanks for looking into this.
- Original Message -
From: Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, August 4, 2004 9:45 am
Subject: Multicast NS and draft-daley-ipv6-tsllao-00.txt
> Section 2,1 says:
> Hosts MUST NOT send Neighbour Solicitations with spec
Section 2,1 says:
Hosts MUST NOT send Neighbour Solicitations with specified source
addresses and TSLLAO to nodes for which there is no pre-existing
neighbour cache entry, or state is INCOMPLETE, unless these nodes are
known to support TSLLAOs.
This is because such Neighbour Solicit
