Hi Thomas,
The text looks good, I'll add it.
thanks,
John
> -Original Message-
> From: ext Thomas Narten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 September, 2003 21:16
> To: Loughney John (NRC/Helsinki)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Node Req: Issue26:
Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert
> Option - RFC2711
>
>
>
>
> Thomas Narten wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >
> >>Reading 2711, there are some host / server specific issues
> about 2711.
> >>Suggested text:
Thomas Narten wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reading 2711, there are some host / server specific issues about 2711.
Suggested text:
IPv6 Router Alert Option specific [RFC-2711] defines a new option in the
s/specific/specifically/?
IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Header. Hosts MAY support the router
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Reading 2711, there are some host / server specific issues about 2711.
> Suggested text:
> IPv6 Router Alert Option specific [RFC-2711] defines a new option in the
s/specific/specifically/?
> IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Header. Hosts MAY support the router alert option
>
> Section 9 begins by saying:
>
> > 9. Router-Specific Functionality
> >
> > This section defines general host considerations for IPv6 nodes that
> > act as routers. Currently, this section does not discuss routin-
> > specific requirements.
>
> an then immediately says
>
> > 9.1.1 IPv6