subject:"RE\: \[dhcwg\] \/128 address allocation and localized IPv6 addressspace exhaustion, was RE\: Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with MO bits"

RE: [dhcwg] /128 address allocation and localized IPv6 addressspace exhaustion, was RE: Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with MO bits

2008-10-30 Thread Templin, Fred L

-Original Message- From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [dhcwg] /128 address

Re: [dhcwg] /128 address allocation and localized IPv6 addressspace exhaustion, was RE: Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with MO bits

2008-10-30 Thread Ole Troan

I have a couple of related questions regarding /128s: 1) can a requesting router use DHCPv6 prefix delegation to obtain /128's from a delegating router? yes, but that seems a little contrived. 2) Must a requesting router examine the MO bits in another router's RAs before determining that