Re: [dhcwg] Semantics of Stateful Bits for the Client

2005-05-28 Thread Ted Lemon
On May 27, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: Does anyone really see any value in 1? And this is always possible - just don't configure the DHCPv6 server with any configuration parameters to send out. 1 seems a bit odd, yes. --

RE: [dhcwg] Semantics of Stateful Bits for the Client

2005-05-27 Thread Bound, Jim
> Does anyone really see any value in 1? > > And this is always possible - just don't configure the DHCPv6 server > with any configuration parameters to send out. I don't and never did. I think it odd too. I will share my view of one reason why this happened. Realize my priority is always co

RE: [dhcwg] Semantics of Stateful Bits for the Client

2005-05-27 Thread Bernie Volz \(volz\)
Does anyone really see any value in 1? And this is always possible - just don't configure the DHCPv6 server with any configuration parameters to send out. - Bernie > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Bound, Jim > Sent: Friday, May 27,