Re: Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-22 Thread Ray Hunter
+1 Firstly, I have been lurking on the 3484-revise discussion in 6man for a long time. I agree with Brian's proposal: [source destination of a /48 ULA prefix match = prefer over 2000:/3 space. Otherwise don't (by default).] Secondly, I think Homenet still has a lot of work to do,

Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-21 Thread Tim Chown
On 20 Mar 2012, at 21:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote: It is a surprise to me that ULA addresses are not by default routable within the site. I can easily imagine a number of LLN border routers which autonomously allocate different ULA prefixes for

Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-21 Thread Don Sturek
Hi Tim, One more consideration: In the home, it is possible that multiple independent subnets could be combined, each with their own ULA prefix. This would happen in cases where the homeowner buys multiple silo'ed solutions (like a home automation system, Wi-Fi AP with connected MACs/Pcs, etc)

RE: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-21 Thread Anders Brandt
Brian Carpenter writes: On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote: Kerry Lynn writes: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Dave Thaler dtha...@microsoft.com wrote: Brian Carpenter writes: [...] It is a surprise to me that ULA addresses are not by default routable within the site. I

RE: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-21 Thread Anders Brandt
Tim Chown wrote: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:55 On 20 Mar 2012, at 21:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote: It is a surprise to me that ULA addresses are not by default routable within the site. I can easily imagine a number of LLN border routers

Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-21 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Don, On 2012-03-22 01:24, Don Sturek wrote: Hi Tim, One more consideration: In the home, it is possible that multiple independent subnets could be combined, each with their own ULA prefix. This would happen in cases where the homeowner buys multiple silo'ed solutions (like a home

RE: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-20 Thread Anders Brandt
Kerry Lynn writes: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Dave Thaler dtha...@microsoft.com wrote: Brian Carpenter writes: [...] Let me be clear. If a local service has (for some reason) both a ULA and a non- ULA global address, and the host has both, I think the correct default behaviour

Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-20 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote: Kerry Lynn writes: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Dave Thaler dtha...@microsoft.com wrote: Brian Carpenter writes: [...] Let me be clear. If a local service has (for some reason) both a ULA and a non- ULA global address, and the host has both, I