All,
The WG Last Call has ended with a strong show of support.
Wes,
Are there any editorial changes that need to be made prior to
advancement?
Regards,
Brian
On 11/29/11 10:51 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
All,
This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
Titl
I just posted an updated version (-01) of this draft that clears the IDNits,
but I received no other substantive feedback at last call, so I think it's
ready to proceed.
Thanks,
Wes
> -Original Message-
> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Brian H
Support.
W
On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
>
> Title : RFC3627 to Historic status
> Author(s) : Wesley George
> Filename : draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt
> Pages : 4
> Date : 2011
@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt
Support!
Thank you for this document.
This is understandable/useful guide line to avoid conflict for users.
Regards,
-Shishio
(2011/11/30 0:51), Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working
Support!
Thank you for this document.
This is understandable/useful guide line to avoid conflict for users.
Regards,
-Shishio
(2011/11/30 0:51), Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
>
> Title : RFC3627 to Historic status
> Author(s) : Wes
Brian Haberman wrote
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
>
> Title : RFC3627 to Historic status
:
> as Informational. Substantive comments and statements of support for
> advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list.
Support.
-
Matsu
Support.
-as
On 29 Nov 2011, at 13:51, Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
>
> Title : RFC3627 to Historic status
> Author(s) : Wesley George
> Filename : draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt
> Pages : 4
> Date
* Brian Haberman
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
>
> Title : RFC3627 to Historic status
> Author(s) : Wesley George
> Filename : draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt
> Pages : 4
> Date : 2011-11-28
>
> as Informational. Substantive comments a
Support
Tina
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Victor
Kuarsingh
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:36 PM
To: Randy Bush
Cc: 6man Chairs; Brian Haberman; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic
Support
Victor k
Sent from my iPad
On 2011-11-29, at 11:09 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
>> Title : RFC3627 to Historic status
>> as Informational.
>
> support
>
> randy
> -
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
> Title : RFC3627 to Historic status
> as Informational.
support
randy
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www
I support this. 3627 has become misleading.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2011-11-30 04:51, Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
>
> Title : RFC3627 to Historic status
> Author(s) : Wesley George
> Filename : draft-ietf-6man-362
12 matches
Mail list logo
