Hi Ole,
On 10-09-13 03:16 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6
5) full IPv6 support with DHCPv6
by partly broken I mean lacking dual stack / IPv4/IPv6 multihoming support. i.e
happy eyeballs or having other serious short comings. I do not want to enable
IPv6 on hosts
Suresh,
4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6
5) full IPv6 support with DHCPv6
by partly broken I mean lacking dual stack / IPv4/IPv6 multihoming support.
i.e happy eyeballs or having other serious short comings. I do not want to
enable IPv6 on hosts implementations that e.g have 75 second
Krishnan
Cc: olaf.bonn...@telekom.de; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AW: New version available
Suresh,
4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6
5) full IPv6 support with DHCPv6
by partly broken I mean lacking dual stack / IPv4/IPv6
multihoming support. i.e happy eyeballs or having other
...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Ole Troan
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:32 AM
To: Suresh Krishnan
Cc: olaf.bonn...@telekom.de; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AW: New version available
Suresh,
4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6
5) full IPv6 support with DHCPv6
: olaf.bonn...@telekom.de; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AW: New version available
XP has limitations but is still usable if IPv6 is enabled.
On 9/14/10 10:40 AM, Jason Weil jason.w...@cox.com wrote:
The whole lack of IPv6 transport in XP for DNS kinda fails
the 'full IPv6
support
To: Weil, Jason (CCI-Atlanta); otr...@employees.org; Suresh Krishnan
Cc: olaf.bonn...@telekom.de; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AW: New version available
XP has limitations but is still usable if IPv6 is enabled.
On 9/14/10 10:40 AM, Jason Weil jason.w...@cox.com wrote:
The whole lack
Hi Jason,
On 10-09-14 10:50 AM, jason.w...@cox.com wrote:
True.
Usable in a dual-stack environment.
Not usable IPv6-only.
Absolutely right. The BBF architecture in question is dual-stack.
Thanks
Suresh
IETF IPv6 working
XP has limitations but is still usable if IPv6 is enabled.
on a dual-stack lan, or one with a specific dns-over-v4 crutch for xp
randy
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests:
I was referring to dual stack.
On 9/14/10 12:08 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
XP has limitations but is still usable if IPv6 is enabled.
on a dual-stack lan, or one with a specific dns-over-v4 crutch for xp
randy
=
John Jason Brzozowski
Olaf,
thx for your comments. I nearly forgot that an ISP has to offer its customers
a good service, thx for reminding me ;-).
I'm just inserting as an answer a sentence, I found in an email posted by Tom
Petch on this mailing list in another context:
Tom Petch wrote on Fr 10.09.2010
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ole Troan wrote:
4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6
we don't care about 1. we do _not_ want to deliver IPv6 service to 2 +
3. so the problematic one is 4. does anyone know of any class 4 IPv6
implementation?
I'd imagine cany class 4 IPv6 devices will quickly be pushed
11 matches
Mail list logo
