On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:24:59PM -0500, Brian Haberman wrote:
The WG Last Call has passed on this with two substantive comments.
The following is the proposed changes to -13 to address them. Please
voice your support or disagreement with these changes.
Looks good to me too.
I agree with the changes too
Ron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David Malone
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 5:33
To: Brian Haberman
Cc: Bob Hinden; IPv6 WG
Subject: Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:
draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-13.txt
: IPv6 WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-
13.txt
All,
The WG Last Call has passed on this with two substantive
comments.
The following is the proposed changes to -13 to address them. Please
voice
your support or disagreement with these changes.
1. Length of appended
All,
The WG Last Call has passed on this with two substantive comments.
The following is the proposed changes to -13 to address them. Please
voice
your support or disagreement with these changes.
1. Length of appended MD5 hash value:
OLD:
Compute the MD5 hash [7] of the
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Brian Haberman wrote:
The WG Last Call has passed on this with two substantive comments.
The following is the proposed changes to -13 to address them. Please voice
your support or disagreement with these changes.
I'm fine with these changes.
1. Length of appended
