RE: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations

2003-09-30 Thread john . loughney
Hi Thomas, I'll remove the text. John > -Original Message- > From: ext Thomas Narten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 September, 2003 13:50 > To: Loughney John (NRC/Helsinki) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11.

Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations

2003-09-30 Thread Brian Haberman
From: ext Thomas Narten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 September, 2003 21:36 To: Loughney John (NRC/Helsinki) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations I am not a security expert, perhaps Jari could comment on this section. This doc

Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations

2003-09-30 Thread Thomas Narten
> Your comments at the end of this mail confused me. Do you want the text > removed or do you want clarifying text? I'm fine with removing it. My last point was more about if it's felt the text needs to stay. Thomas IETF IPv6

RE: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations

2003-09-29 Thread john . loughney
PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations > > > > I am not a security expert, perhaps Jari could comment on > this section. > > This document does not introduce any new security > vulnerabilites on the > > Internet. However,

Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations

2003-09-29 Thread Thomas Narten
> I am not a security expert, perhaps Jari could comment on this section. > This document does not introduce any new security vulnerabilites on the > Internet. However, in creating this document some of the contributors > felt that there are security issues that are not covered in existing RFCs >