RE: RE: RE: [saag] security consideration of CGA and SSAS - I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas

2013-03-25 Thread Christian Huitema
i'; 'Ray Hunter' Subject: Re: RE: RE: [saag] security consideration of CGA and SSAS - I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas Christian Huitema 写于 2013-03-25 12:33:40: > > What is the pointing of adding sec since the ratio of effor > required by  attacker and user is alwa

Re: RE: RE: [saag] security consideration of CGA and SSAS - I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas

2013-03-24 Thread Sujing Zhou
Christian Huitema 写于 2013-03-25 12:33:40: > > What is the pointing of adding sec since the ratio of effor > required by attacker and user is always 2^59, as Jari argued. > > 2^59 is a rather large number. Everything else being equal, another > 1 second of computation at the user translates i

RE: RE: [saag] security consideration of CGA and SSAS - I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas

2013-03-24 Thread Christian Huitema
> What is the pointing of adding sec since the ratio of effor required by   > attacker and user is always 2^59, as Jari argued. 2^59 is a rather large number. Everything else being equal, another 1 second of computation at the user translates into another 18 billion years at the attacker. -- C

Re: RE: [saag] security consideration of CGA and SSAS - I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ssas

2013-03-24 Thread Sujing Zhou
Christian Huitema 写于 2013-03-22 07:56:20: > > Hosnieh, > > You should probably split your proposal in two parts: the proposal > to replace CGA by just checking an extract of the address; and > potential improvements to SEND that are independent of whether we > use CGA or your direct comparis