Hi Fred,
I agree that an ICMPv6 message should be sent by the router but I
think it should be the Time Exceeded message (RFC 2463, section 3.3)
rather than a parameter problem (section 3.4) message.
Regards
Suresh
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Fred Templin wrote:
Don't know about the sending host,
octobre 2003 21:21
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: RFC 2460 issue
Off the top of my head I know that RFC3493 needs to be updated since
the IPV6_UNICAST_HOPS socket option now accepts 0 as a valid hop
count. I
]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RFC 2460 issue
Off the top of my head I know that RFC3493 needs to be
updated since
the IPV6_UNICAST_HOPS socket option now accepts 0 as a valid hop
count. I really do not understand what a hop count of 0 implies and
why we should bother updating
