Hi Wes,
On Oct 28, 2011, at 1:52 PM, Wes Beebee wrote:
> What happens when both RA and DHCPv6 are configured?
Both sets of routes are configured.
This is exactly analogous to a situation where RAs are used and an
administrator has configured some routes using a configuration tool like
"rout
f.org; Bob Hinden; mif-cha...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Review requested: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option
What happens when both RA and DHCPv6 are configured?
- Wes
On 10/28/11 9:11 AM, "Brian Haberman" wrote:
All,
The MIF WG is currently defining a DHCPv6 option for defini
Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:52 PM
To: Brian Haberman; IPv6 WG Mailing List
Cc: 6man-...@tools.ietf.org; Bob Hinden; mif-cha...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Review requested: draft-ietf-mif
What happens when both RA and DHCPv6 are configured?
- Wes
On 10/28/11 9:11 AM, "Brian Haberman" wrote:
> All,
> The MIF WG is currently defining a DHCPv6 option for defining
> routes (including default routes) on client nodes. Please review the
> draft and provide any feedback you have.
