> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Leibrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 1:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: The purpose of ULA-G/C
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Not to pick on James&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to pick on James' post, but several have mentioned that
large routing realms would be one reason to require ULA-G/C
and it has not yet been suggested that the reverse DNS could
itself be thought of as a "large routing realm" of sorts
(depending on how applications use
> Not to pick on James' post, but several have mentioned that
> large routing realms would be one reason to require ULA-G/C
> and it has not yet been suggested that the reverse DNS could
> itself be thought of as a "large routing realm" of sorts
> (depending on how applications use the information
