Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats?

2009-10-16 Thread Brian Haberman
...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:46 PM To: Christian Huitema Cc: 6man 6man Subject: Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats? On 2009-10-14 03:38, Christian Huitema wrote: ... First, we wonder about the importance of the 64 bit boundary. Addressing documents specify

RE: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats?

2009-10-14 Thread Perkins, Carroll G
6man Subject: Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats? On 2009-10-14 03:38, Christian Huitema wrote: ... First, we wonder about the importance of the 64 bit boundary. Addressing documents specify that the global address is essentially formed of a 64 bit subnet prefix and a 64

Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats?

2009-10-14 Thread Ole Troan
, October 13, 2009 8:46 PM To: Christian Huitema Cc: 6man 6man Subject: Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats? On 2009-10-14 03:38, Christian Huitema wrote: ... First, we wonder about the importance of the 64 bit boundary. Addressing documents specify that the global address

RE: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats?

2009-10-14 Thread Dunn, Jeffrey H.
10:58 AM To: Perkins, Carroll G Cc: Christian Huitema; 6man 6man; Brian E Carpenter Subject: Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats? routers should never treat /64 as special or as any kind of limit. It's just a convention that /64 is considered the longest normal subnet

RE: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats?

2009-10-14 Thread Templin, Fred L
Troan Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:58 AM To: Perkins, Carroll G Cc: Christian Huitema; 6man 6man; Brian E Carpenter Subject: Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats? routers should never treat /64 as special or as any kind of limit. It's just a convention that /64

RE: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats?

2009-10-14 Thread Dunn, Jeffrey H.
: Christian Huitema; 6man 6man; Brian E Carpenter Subject: RE: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats? Jeffrey, -Original Message- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dunn, Jeffrey H. Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 8:26 AM To: Ole

Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats?

2009-10-14 Thread Brian E Carpenter
...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter [brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:46 PM To: Christian Huitema Cc: 6man 6man Subject: Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats? On 2009-10-14 03:38, Christian Huitema wrote: ... First, we wonder about

Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats?

2009-10-13 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2009-10-14 14:09, Christian Huitema wrote: The second question regards the uniqueness of host identifiers. Suppose we define the address used for stateless translation as: 32 bit provider prefix, 32 bit IPv4 address, and a constant identifier, either 0 or the checksum neutrality value,