RE: is that inconsistent in RFC4291?

2006-04-26 Thread Gray, Eric
d somewhere other than in E-Mail. Is it possible to provide clarification in the form of an errata? -- Eric --> -Original Message- --> From: Brian Haberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 11:02 AM --> To: Lawrence Zou --> Cc

Re: is that inconsistent in RFC4291?

2006-04-26 Thread Brian Haberman
Here is a link to the mailing list archive where this discussion has occurred before: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg05628.html Regards, Brian On Apr 26, 2006, at 5:53, Lawrence Zou wrote: 2.4. Address Type Identification define the link-local prefix as fe80::/10,Is